Which of the following is incorrect in relation to mind maps?

Mind maps are designed to provide a visual representation of information and ideas, enabling users to summarize complex topics effectively. They are particularly useful for organizing thoughts, brainstorming, and enhancing memory retention. The primary function of a mind map is to show the relationships between different ideas and concepts, helping to illustrate connections and associations.

When considering the function and design of mind maps, they are not intended to provide in-depth information at each level. Instead, they focus on keywords, phrases, and visuals at various branches that represent ideas or topics. While a few nodes might have more detail, such as examples or further explanations, the main purpose is to maintain a high-level overview rather than delving deeply into exhaustive details. This characteristic makes mind maps distinct from tools designed for comprehensive data presentation.

In contrast, summaries and connections between ideas are fundamental strengths of mind maps, and they can bear resemblance to rich pictures, which offer a broader and sometimes more narrative method of conveying concepts visually. However, rich pictures typically include more detail and complexity than mind maps. Thus, the correct distinction lies in the mind map's approach to conveying information without emphasizing extensive, layered depth at each branch.