Which of the following is not correct in relation to options?

In the context of options in decision-making, the statement that "doing nothing is never an option" is not correct. In many scenarios, especially in business change practices, choosing to do nothing can actually be a valid option. This is often referred to as the 'status quo' decision, where stakeholders may assess that the current situation is better than any proposed changes, or simply that resources may not allow for any changes at that time.

Understanding that doing nothing can be an option allows decision-makers to weigh the potential impacts of remaining in the current state against the benefits and risks of other proposed options. It emphasizes the importance of analyzing the full scope of possibilities, which should include the implications of maintaining the current situation.

On the other hand, the other statements are accurate in the context of options. Suggested options should indeed be contained in a business case to provide a structured analysis of possible paths forward. A shortlist of three or four options is preferable as it strikes a balance between having enough choices to evaluate and manageable complexity. Finally, considering the feasibility of all options is crucial to ensure that any chosen path is realistic and executable within the given constraints.