In Gap Analysis, what might it mean if an activity is not on the "As Is" but is on the "To Be" model?

When an activity is absent from the "As Is" model but present in the "To Be" model, it suggests that the activity or function is envisioned as a necessary addition to the future state of the organization. This implies that the activity needs to be developed to meet the new goals, processes, or improvements intended in the "To Be" model.

In the context of gap analysis, the presence of this activity in the future state highlights a recognized need for it within the intended development or transformation strategy. This might involve scenario planning, resource allocation, or skill development related to that new function. Ultimately, the goal is to bridge the gap between the current capabilities and the desired future state, indicating that efforts must be taken to create and implement this function for successful change.

While the other choices touch on aspects of operational planning and assessment, they do not capture the proactive implication of adding a new activity to the future state necessitating its development.